When a real estate owner retains an architect or contractor to carry out work on his or her property, the owner is often subject to a “standard” form agreement developed by the American Institute of Architects (AIA). This is usually accompanied by the assurance that the “independently developed” agreement is known, widespread and takes due account of the interests of both parties. It is understandable that this seems attractive to many owners who wish to launch their projects as quickly as possible, and the agreement will finally be signed after a brief review without revision. However, on closer inspection, homeowners will find that they are at a significant disadvantage under the standard agreement. Point 8.3.1 a201 outside the licensee`s property indicates that a contractor is entitled to a reasonable extension of time if the work is delayed by “unusual delivery delays,” “inevitable losses,” “other causes beyond the contractor`s control” or “other causes cited by the contractor and which the architect identifies warrant delays.” The extension of the deadline must be appropriate “as the architect can see.” Section 8.3.1 does not provide for an adjustment to the contract price. However, Section 8.3.3 specifies that Section 8.3 does not object to a delay injury to which the contractor is entitled under another provision of the contract. AIA agreements are not as impartial and balanced as they may seem. First, the AIA is an organization that, according to its website, represents “the professional interests of American architects” and formal agreements reflect such interests. In addition, the aIA form agreements have been subject to numerous revisions since the introduction of the first forms, and each revision has shifted the balance of owners to architects and contractors.
This ongoing change is partly due to the fact that the Association of General Contractors is working with the AIA to develop multi-type agreements. As expected, this has resulted in formal agreements that tend to favour the architect and contractor over the owner, as the following two examples will show. G705-2001 (formerly G805-2001), Subcontractor List Such a service, which incorrectly characterizes B141 as an additional service, is the analysis of the owner`s planning needs for the project. Such an analysis is essential to ensure that the architect`s design meets the needs of the owner. Many other design tasks, traditionally considered basic services, have been shifted to the detriment of the owner. Everyone must be checked by an owner to ensure that the owner`s expectations are reflected in the final design of the project. Quick notification and good documentation are essential. However, regardless of the terms of the contract, it is advisable to contact the owners and architects as soon as the problems arise. G701S-2017, Change Order, Contractor-Subcontractor Variation In these uncertain times, unexpected delays caused by events or actions outside the contractor`s control area are likely, if not some.